The Venusian Manifesto
Orgasms are the consequence of a chain reaction that starts with nervous system stimulation that escalates in intensity and culminates in triggering a neurotransmitter payoff response in the brain. The neurotransmitters flood the brain and bond with receptors. The experience of good feelings associated with these types of neurotransmitters bonding to receptors in the brain is Mother Nature's way of rewarding a behavior that serves the agenda of sustainment of life in some way.
The orgasm is part of a larger natural and organic system that proportionately matches existential behaviors to physiological rewards and you can see this evidenced in the many interactions that humans encounter. Seeing a person smile at you produces a certain amount of neurotransmitter payoff response where the stimulation has happened through the sense of sight. Petting a cat or dog produces a certain amount of neurotransmitter payoff response where the stimulation has happened through the sense of touch, probably a more voluminous response than seeing a smile because it is a more involved exposure. Eating a delicious lunch produces a certain amount of neurotransmitter payoff response where the stimulation has happened through the sense of taste, probably a more voluminous response than petting a cat or dog since eating is a bodily requirement.
Notice that this system is natural and is organic and is a pattern and has consistency. If this pattern of nature was inconsistent, then the organism would not make the correct associations and rewards would seem random to the organism and then the participation in the existential behavior would be piecemeal and uninspired, thus jeopardizing the continuance of the species. Notice also that this pattern features the quality of proportionality where the relative size and nature of the stimulation corresponds to a volumetric response. If the matchings weren't proportional, then again, we would be doing the wrong behaviors due to the system of rewards being mismatched. This organic system of stimuli and responses is so embedded to the human existence—and likely other organisms as well—that anticipation of known rewards will guide our thinking almost as much as the actual stimulation does. Thus, this natural system serves us as an ever-present and non-verbal guidance system existing within each of us as individuals in our experiences and collectively through our shared anatomy and physiology.
The orgasm is a part of this natural system, in fact, it is the zenith and has primacy over other concerns of life. Positioning this phenomenon of life as the epitome is intended to make all other concerns generally subservient. The hope of having this experience should always be within the understanding of the adult individual. It is clear to see this within the adult males of our species as they will go to great lengths to quell the sexual drive within them. The natural and organic system of existential behaviors and physiological rewards has made this experience a primal and singular most compelling end goal to him. So men become highly interested in the sexual experience as a topic and subject matter. But it is also clear from their behaviors that the orgasm associated with masturbation and the orgasm associated with actual sex are not equals. If they were equals in terms of the volume of neurotransmitter payoff response, then the conveniency of masturbation would prevail and they would have no need to be even interested in females. Of course, this scenario would jeopardize the continuance of our species and the natural system is designed to not allow this. In short, men are into sex for one real and most dominant reason—the physiological effect associated with the natural system.
The reason why I point these details out to you is that I, as an adult female, find myself in general but not exact agreement with the male sentiment. When I compare my own experiences to what I see reflected from the typical adult male, I recognize that orgasm and the physiological result that can only be achieved with actual sex is highly compelling, however, I also know that in order for me to experience this same level of neurological reward, I have to know and use the Technique. The Technique yields to me the experience of orgasm during penetration. But for men, they do not have to apply an idea like the Technique, it seems that the situation is more automatic for them. But beyond this resonance in sentiment, I also recognize the difference in payoff responses between masturbation and achieving orgasm during penetration. One is not a substitute for the other because the volume of neurotransmitter payoff response are not equal. I attribute the distinction between masturbation and orgasm during penetration to the natural and organic system of existential behaviors and physiological rewards. Both the typical adult male experiences and my own experiences reflect motivation from the the same source, a source that is consistent and proportional and carries with it a non-verbalized and non-visual logic.
But while I am telling you of this sharing of sentiment between the typical adult male perspective and my own perspective, I can convey to you that I have not often found that women are also reflecting the same enthusiasm for the same reasons. To demonstrate this point to you, I would like to call your attention to a scene from a popular 90's sitcom television show named Seinfeld. The scene in question is known for the use of the phrase "Yada, yada, yada". Three of the characters have a discussion regarding the way that women can exhibit a dismissive attitude towards sex, applying the phrase "yada, yada, yada" to the event—a difficult notion for men to accept. Elaine agrees with this dismissive attitude and mentions meeting a man, having lunch with the man and then having sex with that man only to not hear from the man again. From her perspective, the experience of having lunch was a more pleasurable experience than having sex with that man. When the male characters—Jerry and George—hear of this dismissive attitude, they feel astounded at the idea that the experience of a lunch could rival the experience of sex. While this show is a comedy, and the scene is intended to be a platform for a joke, the joke itself is about the discrepancy between the male perception and experience of sex as highly desirable, but the female perception and experience of sex as uninspiring if not deflating. This joke does not focus on the Elaine character and, potentially, her processing of feelings of disappointment, rather, the joke is more about the male reaction of surprise and bewilderment. The audience too must agree with the premise of the joke and finds the basis relatable to some degree as indicated by the presence of laughter and not confusion.
According to the natural system of behaviors and rewards, lunch should not seem the same as sex at all. She, as an organism living within the same system as men, should be rewarded for the behavior of sex to a similar degree to what men know. The properties of consistency and proportionality should dominate her experience for the purpose of continuation of the species. The feeling of being rewarded for her participation in the continuance of the species should be undeniable to her.
But this sentiment does have resonance with the broader experiences of women because the scientists of our modern era acknowledge an issue among women known as the Orgasm Gap (↗). They have identified that women are frequently participating in sex but are not experiencing a physiological reward as men do. This confirms that the issue is widespread among women. One thing to note about the statistics that the scientists use is that they do not make a distinction between female masturbation and orgasm during penetration. Furthermore, when it comes to proposing solutions on this issue, I would say that the best advice these experts give is to settle for female masturbation, either self-performed or else imposed on her by her male partner. They likely do not believe that orgasm during penetration is possible.
Why would they believe that it is not possible for women to achieve orgasm during penetration? People, I find, are often highly visual in attempts to analyze. In fact, the recent global event of the Covid-19 pandemic shows you how many individuals had a difficult time processing an unseen hazard even when there was plenty of reason for them to at least question what is really happening. I believe that many people would intuit that since men have different parts, then they have different experiences and they simply accept the idea that there would be inconsistency. But a more nuanced restatement of that idea would be that women and men have the same tissues present but reconfigured for different agendas. Additionally, since the female is defined by having two X chromosomes (XX) and the male is defined by having an X and a Y chromosome (XY), then if biological functionality is missing between either gender, it would more likely happen to men then to women due to less genetic instructions for functionality.
If female anatomy is only a reconfiguration of the same tissues as male anatomy, then this would imply that the processes are the same but have a different mechanical approach. When you closely examine exactly what the male approach entails, you can restate the concept behind his approach. Instead of thinking of this as "having sex with a female", you can restate this and say that the "male is having sex on the female" by using her anatomy as a resistive tool to initiate a process within himself. Then the female parallel would be to use the male anatomy as a resistive tool to initiate a process within herself. To any natural world designer, divine or otherwise, keeping the process the same with a slight modification is simply an efficient design. If the processes between the two are parallel processes differing only in mechanical approach, then this would bring us back to confirmation that the natural and organic system of behaviors being matched to neurotransmitter payoff responses is fully consistent and implies that women have the ability to experience orgasm during penetration. This description also brings us back to the Technique. The Technique is the female parallel process to the male process of achieving orgasm during sexual intercourse. It is the key to experiencing the single most voluminous neurotransmitter payoff response that a woman can know.
The Technique is the missing link. It includes the idea of the reconfiguration of tissues. It includes the idea of taking an active role in a process that is parallel to the male process. It satisfies the notion that the natural and organic system of matching existential behaviors to physiological rewards includes female participation. The key, all along, has been to resist superficial analysis and reaffirm our commonalities as genders.
I hope you now see what I see: a need for advocacy and an opportunity to integrate something new into our lives collectively as women. The purpose of this manifesto is to ask you to consider the content of this website as a starting basis for a new chapter in female knowledge transfer.
Female knowledge transfer includes preparing women for menstruation, helping women choose from birth control methods, preparing women for the phases of pregnancy, preparing women for labor, helping women through lactation. Let us also recognize the need to prepare women for the sexual experience and close the Orgasm Gap.
I can go as far as to suggest that you read the book that I have written for you by the title "Female Sexual Success: A Guide for the Technique" which details the way that I have beaten the odds. This book is just a click away (↗) and is included in this website free of charge. And I can build a website with a page of content that helps you see the larger need. But the change will only happen if you also see the positive benefits and you also choose to advocate, in even the smallest way that you feel comfortable. Even if the extent of your participation is nothing more than a desire for improvement.